Re: JSM coilovers
One aspect of Tyfoo's questions that Jeff didn't answer directly, and I have seen it mentioned many times...
Camber is camber
toe is toe
caster is caster
Regardless of the angle of the ball joint in the design, one SHOULD be able to run the stock alignment specs with either kit. The exact position of the aduster cams to achieve that alignment will likely be different from one supplier to the other.
I have not heard that either kit can not achieve stock alignment specs. The only way this could happen is if the caster or camber caused by a change from stock geometry would cause the suspension to run out of adjustment travel before reaching the desired alignment settings. I can't believe this would be the case with either design (especially with camber... I mean, who would make a kit that prevents the wheel from being vertical... oh, yeah, I forgot the ricer guys.... well, we're not them!). Now, just because one CAN run the stock alignment doesn't mean one SHOULD. In particular, it has been discussed that with 275 series tires in front, more caster is probably a good thing. It would be interesting to know if one kit allows more caster than the other. I sort of doubt it.... that would mean the tubular portion of the arms were made to relocate the upper or lower ball joints farther forward or aft compared to the stock suspension. This would be an unwise thing to do unless researched very carefully, and I'm pretty sure neither supplier did so (at least not on purpose).
So unless someone wants to jump in here and explain otherwise, I would say either kit CAN be adjusted to the camber, caster and toe settings called for by GM.