Re: HOOVER timeslips
Matt this wrighting may get you mad BUT Please read it and try to understand that I dont get my math right for the moment. no disrespect. And I just wants to learn things out to bee a better engine mekanic.
Matt Hoovers timeslips story
2years ago.
21/8 -03 60` 1.549 1/8 6.359 @ 112,68 1/4 9.897 @ 137
Next slip is from the year -05 This is awesome runs, fast and would demands around 986Hp on the crank to do the fastest ETrun this day..
7/6 -05 60´ 1.524 1/8 6.316 @ 115.47 1/4 9.730 @ 143.11
17/9 -05 60´ 1.433 1/8 6.363 @ 113.95 1/4 9.803 @ 141.97
17/9 -05 60´ 1.473 1/8 6.325 @ 116.14 1/4 9.696 @ 145.22
17/9 -05 60´ 1.417 1/8 6.240 @ 117.30 1/4 9.572 @ 146.53
And then this incredible run…
13/10 -05 60´ 1.364 1/8 5.803 @ 121.90 1/4 9.035 @ 150.77
But where did you find that extra Hp so fast??
You need around 1172 Hp on the crank to run that low ET and that’s I THINK isto much to find in fiddeling whit boost,timing, slicks, chassie settings ..
If you go 1/4 mile ET times its a differ to almost 200 hp to these ET timeslips.!
If you go 1/4 mile trap speed it’s a differ of about 100 Hp to gain those trapspeeds. !
All to the
http://www.smokemup.com site dyno math calculator..
I and Robert is convinsed that he also could reache the 9.5X maybe a 9.4X time on engine and turbo boost.. BUT we think that a 9.0 OR a 8.9X is in the grasp with a shot of 100 hp NOS…
Matt don’t bee mad at ME but this is what I think is happening here..
You have been driving a steady 9,7x truck almost all year and then in this last month gon down to 9.0?!?!?!
that’s to much to fast on to short time… yes Im not at Your location and I can bee wrong
No hard feelings about this I just whants my math to add up right.
Anders.