Search results

Re: Front Driveshaft Gains and Losses Ok gotchya. I didn't know the 4472 did that. Thanks for the clear up.

Re: Different Ring and Pinion Ratios Your math is correct. Good thing 26.1" tall tires are very common. You're in Sabin, MN huh? East Twin Cities, MN here.

Re: Different Ring and Pinion Ratios Actually this is mis-information, but true to a degree. The actual truth is that with the 4472 case (and most other AWD platforms as well) the FINAL DRIVE LINE RATIO must be the same, front and rear. By combining the right ring and pinion ratios with...

Re: Different Ring and Pinion Ratios Ya that would make our lives a lot easier...well yours if you have a Sy/Ty, mine if I wanted 3.42's all around. I kind of like having offset drive line ratios though, I love old school muscle cars with the big n' littles, and having a slightly larger (by...

Re: Different Ring and Pinion Ratios I've addressed the 2wd 8.5" already, and I don't think the 4x4 info is correct. All my manuals state that only ZR2 S10's and a select few (meaning not all) 2wd 4.3L 5-speeds have the 8.5" rear. Either way, one is too wide and the other is too short.

Re: Different Ring and Pinion Ratios Good to know. His ratios worked out just fine and that's the math I was looking for. It's simple 4th grade math really....cross multiplication. I just wanted a reaffirmation that I was right. The reason I'd like to stick to 3.42/3.55 is because of my...

I've asked around on other forums I belong to (MyS10 and S10forum) and no one could give me a straight answer. From my past answers, let me explain the situation before everyone wants to begin tar and feathering me. -The project is a 2001 regular cab Sonoma 4wd, with a BW4472 t-case from a...

Re: Front Driveshaft Gains and Losses Please excuse me for asking what may seem like a dumb question; I'm just starting to get into the whole AWD thing. I read through the two links posted about racing the 1/4 mile in 2wd, but I'm wondering if that's really beneficial with a BW4472 t-case...